#1) Is “the end of time” or “the end of time” a biblical teaching?
Neither of these terms appear anywhere in the Bible, nor does this doctrine.
Ecclesiastes 1:4 one generation passes away, and another generation comes; but the earth stands forever.
Isaiah 9:7 “In the throne of David and in his kingdom there will be an end over the throne of David and over his kingdom, and to confirm it in judgment and in justice forever and ever.
God’s government, peace & The kingdom will never stop growing, it will grow forever. How does the Kingdom continue to grow? When souls pass from this life into eternity: whether this is meant as a spiritual application (when they are born again) or for our advancement into the Kingdom, once we die, there is always an increase of it. It is not possible to increase unless there is something with the increase (the addition of the soul)
#2) Does Scripture clearly declare through prophecy that the 3rd Temple will be built in Jerusalem before Christ returns?
But I believe that this is the main argument of Ezech. I see something else entirely being mentioned in these chapters. Ezekiel in the 25th year of the Babylonian captivity (Ezek. 40:1) is probably around 580-570 BC. Ezekiel’s visions of a future temple in which there will be priests and sacrifices. Why should God command to begin carnal sacrifices again, after Christ came as the last, final, and only immaculate, perfect sacrifice?
Most Christians who claim to know these things really don’t. This is a part of the Bible that requires study and discernment, and it has been my experience that the larger the company the greater the space for the gnats. I know I’m getting angry for saying that, but oh well, it’s my opinion.
The most obvious explanation I can see for these chapters is that Ezekiel had visions of the Second Temple, which was completed or dedicated around 516 BC. (50-70 years later) which is said to have been built by Ezra or by Ezra. Nehemiah & Zerubbabel, who brought all the various groups of the children of captivity from Babylon back to Jerusalem after 70 years ended in Babylon. Life expectancy was not much in these times; 70 years would be sufficient to purge most of those who were responsible, and send them into Babylonian captivity. Ezekiel receives these visions 45 years before the end of the captivity; roughly, a generation, to pass.
Some Preterists make a similar spiritual language (allegorize) and make this a Spiritual Temple; with spiritual sacrifices there is no need, as I think, of language for the Physical Temple, the future of Ezekiel, but the past for us. Many would like to argue that “the dimensions used in Ezekiel 40-48 are not in other Scriptures (believed to be about the second Temple) and they are also not provided with the dimensions of Herod’s temple, which is still meant.” that the other was built, because of the Prophecy. The restoration of the living sacrifices from the heart (after the sacrifice of Christ) lest the biblical prophecy (ordained by God) would have happened after the sacrifice of Christ.
#3) Wasn’t The Great Battle of Armageddon fought yet?
This, of course, takes the prophesied battle, or Armageddon in the Bible; I am saying that another area of Scripture has been misunderstood.
Revelation 16:16 And he gathered them to a place called in Hebrew Armageddon.
This word is formed from two Hebrew words “Har or Ar” which means Hill, Mountain, Mountain, Hill Country, etc., and “Giddown, Megiddo, or better known as Megiddo,” an ancient city in Canaan. Scripture mentions Mageddo twice: Rev. Zechariah 12:11 Nor is there any mention of a battle there. Revelation simply mentions that this is where they were “gathered.”
Interestingly; Josephus mentions a larger collection of history here “battle” (source) “that Titus, the Roman Emperor and the Emperor’s son, had led the troops from Egypt to the north along the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, passing the region of Jerusalem, and how he came to the neighborhood of Caesarea, the border of Mount Mageddo. Titus and His tenth legion was there waiting for other forces across the Euphrates to Vulturnus, and from Rome they assembled at Har-megeddon, and proceeded to the city of Jerusalem (as this false belief has not yet happened) moreover, historical records also mention this “gathering”, but the number of sources does not matter if they are all to be disproved.
#4) Will there be a New Earth without sin or dying?
“New Earth” appears 4 times in scripture: 2 in the OT; Isaiah 65:17 & 66:22 and 2 times in the NT; 2nd Peter 3:13 & Revelation 21:1 I don’t see why these are coincidences and they assume absolutely nothing about each other. Notice what Isaiah says about the New Earth in Isaiah 65:20 There will no longer be a child of days there, and an old man who has not fulfilled his days, for a child of a hundred years will die; the sinner will be cursed for a hundred years” Sinning, dying & cursed in the New Earth?
New Heaven?
Given that we think of “Heaven” as somewhere in the air or in the universe where God resides, I have some questions. What did I do wrong with the original Sky? Did God do something wrong to deserve a new heaven? While heaven is the house of God, where would God be between the loss of the old and the bringing forth of the new?
#5 Has the resurrection not yet taken place?
This also depends on interpretation, understanding & the doctrine of the righteous which is the resurrection, is it not?
I will gladly admit that the majority of the Church, from the time of Christ, in the Physical Resurrection for all, or at least believe; all believing, because Christ rose bodily. Christ Christ, Son of God; His earthly ministry was not completed until the ascension (40 days after the resurrection) and, regardless of the nature of these mitigating factors, 2 possible fates expected to leave the body of Christ. Eventually it would have been destroyed or placed in a museum.
Resurrection simply means life from death and we have examples of bodily resurrection in the Bible; only these examples and false interpretations of other Scriptures tend to present this Hypothesis as a future reality for all men or all believers.
I think that Paul is better: 1 st Corinthians 15:37 “And what you sow, do not sow to the body, which is to come”, if you believe. this body in this verse refers to our body, he clearly says: The body that is now is not the same as what it is going to have; to dust you shall return, and to dust you shall return.”
Genesis 3:19 To dust you are, and to dust you will return.
#6 Is Jesus bodily / to return to earth bodily and establish a bodily earthly kingdom for 1,000 years?
Acts 1:9-11 And when he had said these things, in their sight, he was taken up: and a cloud received him from their sight. a href=”https://e-info.vn/tag/white-men”> standing by those in white clothing, who said: Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking up into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken up by you into heaven, will come in the same way as you have seen him go into heaven.
Revelation 1:7 “Behold, he is coming with clouds, and every eye will see him, and < i>also< /i> who pierced him, and all the tribes of the earth mourn over him
The action section is always focused on this section: “similarly” What does it mean? Merriam Webster says it is type, type, form, custom, type, manner. What about the Greek word translated “way”? #5158- tropos and is defined as manner, way, fashion, character, deportment.
Neither among the English nor among the Greeks does he name a body, a shape, an image, or even a form or a likeness, but they agree in that manner, manner, way, and/or fashion. This verse does not come any closer to Christ returning in the same body, shape, form or image of the one who left, but says that he will return in the same way, in the manner or manner in which he left.
Let me therefore ask: How, by what reason or manner, should Christ leave? “And the cloud received him out of their sight” Christ left in the cloud; Does not the Scripture also say that he will return, or in the clouds? Revelation 1:7 Behold he came with clouds; And all the tribes of the earth mourn over him. Yes, amen.
Which brings us to the conclusion: The Scripture says openly, every eye will see him. they introduce this verse as much as possible, they have forgotten “even those who pierced him” Did not the 1stCentury people pierce him by striking them? hands & or how the lance pierced his side? How were 1st Century people supposed to see him “coming” when they died? Many try to talk about this by saying that we have pierced him through our sins. How do children see him when they are born?
Luke 17:20 And being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, he answered them and said: physics, which has slipped out of heaven today? If it comes without observation, why is the Church told to look for it? drink”? (Physical)?
#7) Will it be “the end of the world”?
“The end of this world” appears 1 time in the NT: Paul
Matthew 13:40 “As therefore the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so shall it be at the end of this world.”
“The end of the world” appears 5 times in the NT: Vulgate
Matthew 13:39 But the enemy who sowed them is the devil. the harvest is the end of the world; But the reapers are angels.
Matthew 13:49 So it will be at the end of the age: angels will go out and separate the wicked from the midst of the righteous,
Matthew 24:3 And while he was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him secretly, saying: Tell us, when will these things be? and what will be the sign of your coming and end of the world?
Matthew 28:20 teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen
Hebrews 9:26 For then he suffered many times from the beginning of the world: but now once at the end of the world he appeared to release his sin offering.
“The world” in all these examples is the “end of this world” from the Greek word Aion; # 165 in firm s and only eternity, the world, or an age. Is it the end of eternity? Is it the end of the universe? Is it the end of the world?
The last verse here asks the question: Because we are still here; After 2,000 years was Christ born at the end of the world? Was he born at the end of the century?
#8) Are the stars falling to earth?
Revelation 6:13 And the figurative / metaphorical / parabolic / poetic language, I am completely lost. of the Scriptures. Just won’t it be moved forever? Is this not the case, and that there will always be dozens of people on earth? What do we do about the second part? “ the wicked shall not inhabit the earth “Has there ever been a more wicked person on the planet? None; this word cannot be changed with inheritance!
John 17:15-20
I do not ask that you take them out of the world but that you save them from evil. They are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. Sanctify them in truth. Your word is the truth. As you sent me into the world, I sent them into the world. And for them I sanctify myself, that they also may be sanctified in the truth. I do not pray for these only, but also for those who will believe in me through their word;
A typical futurist who believes and promotes Rapture/Rapture believers alive from the earth must believe this prayer; He was vain, dumb, stupid, or ignorant of Christ. Christ prayed to the Father not to take those believers out of this world. Why? This planet is God’s creation and we are also God’s creation. Why did Christ or God not want believers on this earth?
This is by no means an exhaustive list, nor is it intended to provide a complete answer or refutation of why or how I or others think, as we do against the belief of many that “The end of time, the last day,
Spiritually, he has no superiority over the rest in terms of guaranteeing, guaranteeing, or denying salvation to man. Eschatology.-The study of the end of time is a secondary question with respect to salvation. Preterism & Futurism is simply a view of Eschatology. Being second does not mean that it is not important: The eschatology of the past is primarily in the words spoken by Jesus Christ. . As in many cases; no changes or vicissitudes are required to be properly understood. Futurists, on the other hand, have 6 primary words or phrases that they have to change or modify in order to still believe in and promote Futurism.
Soon, Soon, Near, Now, Near, At Hand!
Every verse that was used by the Preterist, that these things will happen soon, and not after a thousand years, must be changed, changed or corrected by the Futurist. Preterist or Futurist?
