When a popular movie comes out, the DVD companies are reluctant to give us the next treatment, except for the movie itself. They will issue a DVD with the standard features: a director’s commentary, a preview of the film, and perhaps a behind-the-scenes featurette. So just when you’ve finished learning everything there is to know about Shaggy Dogs….BAM! Six months later, a single version of Shaggy Dog arrives, featuring 15 never-before-seen minutes of hot licking action! It also has four new commentaries, Troubled Troubled, and an interview with a real dog! alas! You better throw that old Shaggy the Dog DVD in the trash, you bastard! Because check out how new and exciting this news is! That’s new!
But the pain is not done. When the ungrateful shaggy dog sells for a penny, the cut hairy dog comes! alas! It was already approaching 17 minutes of humper legs and a group of chasers! It also has eight all-new commentaries, SIX behind-the-scenes features, online car racing, and free tickets to see DOGS inside. hairy 3! Now, if you’re really a shaggy dog fanatic, I’ve spent $60 three times on the same movie, and just wait until Christmas when Shaggy DA comes to see it straight.
The exact same story is being used across Hollywood. With twice the pay and half the work, why not give the same title to companies twice? This is while you are all shooting. There is no release in these multiples, although the possible lure of money in their pockets is possible. What was to stop the Lions Gate movie from releasing Seeing that it wasn’t rated the first time around? What, what you buy, and then buy again, when it is actually, without reason of course! Another use is simply the word: without reason. The speech is golden. It simply means “this film was not the electronic version we submitted” that’s all. Generally, you’ll see B-grade slasher movies, decorated with all the blood and guts, and given a PG-13 rating so teenagers can buy tickets to it. For the DVD release, the company adds a minute of blood back, and touts around it unextinguished, when in fact, R is a rated movie and it was all one. So don’t be surprised when your new version of Unrattled comes out with Jet Li, it doesn’t add the hardcore karate six orgies you were hoping to see, and instead adds a subplot of a dying musician.
Using the term Unrated is also general enough to say that it is not related to the subject. It could be thirty seconds, or it could be thirty minutes. “We don’t know… you’ll have to see the movie to find out!!!” But here’s the thing. The films of the greatest anger do not add a foot directly to the film itself, (it is usually added in special features) and when it is added to the film, it usually consists of a few processes or some exposure that has been developed. the original, and nothing more. So, seeing as how I’d rather not have people put up with monster machine unedited garbage, I’m going to present you with 10 non-rational movies that aren’t unedited. Enjoy with rice:
1. Savit: Original release February 2005, re-release October 2005.
Not only did this particular version of the “uncut” come out only months after the first release, the new “cut” saw nothing but close-up shots of the intestines, and a clearer view of a man with a brain attached, and nothing more. For those of you who owned the original and bought the new one (like me) I would see my feet in anger and throw them at the Lion’s Gate Films headquarters. (But I’m not doing this. I need my feet. All you guys can go ahead. Good luck.)
2. Dodgeball: Original release December 2004, re-release July 2005.
A surprise hit, Dodgeball was a rare PG-13 comedy that was actually funny. He didn’t rely on gross humor or nudity, it was just funny. But sure enough, only 7 months after the first release, he released an “inconsistency” version of the one-minute-long approach, which mostly consisted of some naked officers. I know. It sounds hilarious. Seriously, why not porn on one side, comedy on the other? What do they have to mix like peanut butter and chocolate? Oh…it makes it more acceptable to hire comedy as well as porn. gotcha
3. Eternal Sun of the Immaculate Mind: Original release September 2004, re-release January 2005.
A great deal, and a fine trick with the use. Eternal Sunshine was never re-released as an “unreleased” version, but rather as an “edition game” which is an end in itself. What is not fine is that the first disc is placed in the 2nd circle, the same as the original release. Much to learn from Charlie Kaufman’s eating habits, everyone else is bad.
4. Spiderman: original release: November 2002, re-release June 2004.
Are not two of them enough for you? Released with a slew of special features, Spiderman was certainly one packed CD. But using the power of promotion for its sequel, Spiderman 1.5 added whatever else it could take, and ended up looking and playing exactly like the original Sideman, just $14.99 more expensive.
5. Parents: Original release March 2001, re-release December 2004.
At least this one was released separately for some time. Released on DVD with almost nothing to offer other than the film, the re-release added some 20 odd scenes that were funny enough to be in the movie anyway.
6. it will be released: it was released rated and without accounts at the same time in October 2005.
It was brought up before, but it must be again. It will turn out to be one of the trickiest movies I’ve ever seen. It portrays itself as a huge action powerhouse, but it’s really a gentle drama about a boy who thinks he’s a dog, played by Morgan Freeman. Yes. I’m not quite sure what the differences are between the unrated and rated ones in this, but I’m sure that some of Morgan Freeman’s characters have strong narratives that were milder in theaters.
7. Bad Santa: Director’s Cut: Original release June 2004, re-release October 2006.
This one is special because it was already supposed to be an “unreleased” edition, called BadDER Santa, which had only one line, and only one line, different from the original film. One can only imagine what will change this time; perhaps desperate and only digitally close in every scene.
8. Not Another Teen Movie: Original release April 2002, re-release July 2005.
Columbia Tri-star decided to blow the dust off this clunker out of the blue in 2005, apparently too late to mark any development of the prototype. After seeing it for the first time, I can’t imagine them covered in more poo or poo-stuffed breasts in a towel, but maybe I just underestimate it.
9. American Psycho: Original release September 2000, re-release June 2005.
One of the most difficult books of the early 90’s tried to become one of the most controversial movies of the early 00’s, but for all its tout “unforgivable skin killer” nothing more was added then a few seconds added to the sex scene. nor more. Kind of takes it out of the mouth, maybe that’s why he didn’t put it in the box.
10. Movie Date: Released and Unrated at the same time in May 2006.
and finally, perhaps the worst comedy, it always becomes worse, with a completely unnecessary treatment. The only scene added is where the woman sits completely naked, for no reason at all. Hilarious! Act now, without rest! Ooo, the kid will see now!
I hope this list has helped inform you about the seedier practices of cinema that we all enjoy. Soon, if you pay attention, you will know when the movie spot, which will definitely be ours. treatment without accounting, and you will either be able to avoid it altogether, or sell your old one and buy a new one, before it is considered cheap. Thanks for reading, and be sure to catch a re-release of this article titled: BANNED! TOO SEXY murder curse, nudity! INCUT EDITION 4.7!
Report:
-
www.amazon.com special thanks information. Special thanks for reading it. ; To learn more about www.amazon.com to learn, go to www.amazon.com. To learn more about yourself, look in the mirror.
