Carl Helvie – 31 – was given six months to live after being diagnosed with lung cancer. He refused surgery, chemotherapy and radiation, and instead turned to natural cancer medicines. Two years later the lung cancer went away; He cured himself cancer. Lung cancer is the leading cancer killer of both men and women.
Conventional medical treatment for lung cancer consists of surgery to remove part or all of the cancerous lung; chemotherapy and chemotherapy. Doctors do not recommend a natural cure for cancer. They know about natural cancer remedies, but why do doctors recommend natural cancer cures when natural cancer treatments can’t make a profit?
Describe your medical background.
I am a genealogical nurse with two masters and a doctorate in public health and health, a new book entitled “Holistic Elderly Health” and 55 years of experience as a nurse practitioner, educator, author and researcher. I started using a holistic approach with clients and in my life at the age of 31, when I was diagnosed with lung cancer and told by my first doctor that I was dead in six months. I decided to use this supplement, and now I am 75 years old and free from chronic diseases and prescription drugs.
What treatment does your doctor recommend?
Surgery and chemotherapy. But a friend referred me to a doctor in Northern Virginia who had treated laetrile at the National Institutes of Health< /a> and so far so successful. when he did it privately. He recommended laetrile and special diet supplements.
Why should you reject conventional medicine for your lung cancer?
I avoided traditional chemo and surgery and went 100 percent holistic. I believe that cancer often spreads, and I have seen people so debilitated by chemotherapy that I did not want to subject myself to it.
Have you told your doctor what you are trying to do?
My primary doctor saw me every three months when I got X-rays, but I didn’t tell him what I was doing because I knew he wouldn’t understand.
Are these visits only to trace the tumor?
He had to follow the progress of the tumor. He told me that I should have treatment at the next visit, but I wanted to see how he progressed without treatment.
Over time, didn’t the X-rays show the swelling decreasing? How much time did you spend on these X-rays?
I don’t know if the tumor was scary, but I know that after going out every 3 months for X-rays for two years, the doctor said that he made the wrong diagnosis. I do not know whether it will shrink or not grow further.
At the end of two years, he said he was guessing he had made the wrong diagnosis (despite biopsies and other tests). I then took the report of the biopsy, X-rays and other tests to a friend who was the doctor in charge of the Blue Cross-Blue shield for the northern state. The cancer firmly confirmed her.
Why is the medical industry so opposed tonatural cancer treatment?
Many in medical training are hesitant to recommend this approach because their medical training is focused on drugs and surgery, and they are unaware of the success of medicine, hence the school medicine.They provide many free samples to doctors, and many financial studies.
In the 1930’s and 40’s a man named Hoxsey treated cancer patients more successfully (using herbs) than other doctors using traditional treatment in the USA. After the FDA was harassed and the medical profession was brought into court, and a certain medical man reviewed his records, and visited the patients, and concluded that more patients who were alive, and more care than others in the profession. He was acquitted by the Court, but continued to be harassed by the FDA and by doctors, and finally moved from the USA to Mexico.
There was a similar story about Renee Caisse, who was a public health nurse in Canada, who used the herb with her cancer patients. She was successful but also troubled. So the main opposition is from the drug companies and from the FDA who support them. There is a fair amount of literature that speaks to this. There was a similar situation recently with the elderly who were getting cheaper drugs in Canada, and many tried to stop this law. (MONEY, MONEY, MONEY).
What was your cancer treatment during that critical period when you had cancer?
A very restrictive diet. It consisted of mostly fresh fruits, vegetables, grains, and nuts (no peanuts allowed). . Avoid animal protein, including dairy products, which are a heavy drain on the pancreatic enzymes needed to use vitamins effectively. 75 percent of the diet is included uncooked, because critical enzymes are destroyed at high temperatures. In addition, it has no sugar, preserves strong spices, stimulants such as coffee, alcohol and cigarettes; no soy products.
At what point after diagnosis did you lose weight?
After two years when my primary doctor said he made the wrong diagnosis, I eased up on my diet. However, I continued to follow a lot of it and now I eat as much organic food as I can find and eat mainly grains, nuts, fruits and vegetables, with a small amount of chicken or fish or fish or forage (up to two times a week because of mercury poisoning) in the evening.
Organic milk in cereal with apples and nuts for breakfast and sometimes organic eggs. I believe that pesticides, growth hormones, antibiotics and other additives in food plus processed foods overwhelm the body and lead to disease. So I try to limit it as much as possible. I eat a small carb meal about once a week and never use diet sodas or sugar.
Why not beef or sugar?
Cows are injected with hormones, antibiotics and other unnatural substances. Sugar has also been implicated in various illnesses.
Finally, describe your pre-cancer diet.
The diet was typical of fast food, lots of meat, fruits and vegetables, Cokes and sodas; and many sweets.
Visit Carl’s website:
www.HealthyHolisticAging.com
