One of the most important historical questions has been the question of religion. Wars were fought and many died for religion. The freedom of religion enshrined in the First Amendment includes the constitution and the exercise clause, so it has been very important in America. The two clauses were also important in defining certain aspects of religion in America. The constitutional clause has various interpretations, but basically it pertains to the government not being able to have an official sponsor of religion or church. Thus, the government cannot declare that any particular religion is the religion of America. The basic exercise clause is generally self-serving, but allows people to practice any religion.
The founders found it very necessary to include this clause for several reasons. Besides, both religious experiments and persecution had damaged many societies and even caused major conflict in the early colonial times The constitutional clause protects the corruption of the Church through politics and in turn protects the government from conflicts with religion. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 when King James II was suspected of being an attempt to establish Roman Catholicism as the established religion of England. the first example of the struggles the Founders could have argued for establishing the clause. The exercise of the free clause further separates church and state, which is based on previous conditions such as ancient colonial times, a sense the Founders included.
But both clauses can be terminated. The free exercise clause ends when the right to practice a particular religion conflicts with other values and interests important to a free society. The constitutional clause has been interpreted so broadly as to prevent funds from being given to religious groups and to provide the only common benefits granted to citizens such as fire protection and the need The establishment clause is perhaps more controversial than the free exercise clause because the establishment clause has many interpretations, while the goal of the free exercise clause is generally the same.
But these clauses were at odds in many cases. For example: the government funds soldiers and chaplains who provide services to soldiers in the service; but some argue that it is contrary to the principles of the constitution. Then again the free exercise clause would be violated if the government did not include chaplains in the army. Many students miss school every year for religious holidays, but providing school for these absences is a violation of the constitution. However, if the school students were not allowed to use for religious events, some could argue. closed against free exercise. Innumerable, however, fell between these two clauses, or violated one of the other. Here is how to resolve conflicts. The first conflict of the government chaplains is not necessarily the funding of the religion, but the employee of the army. I believe that in this way the establishment clause does not hurt. The second problem with religious holidays was the push to change “Christmas Break” to “Winter Fruit”. I believe that giving each student a memorial day is the simplest solution. In general, whether or not the state is equally about individuals, there must be a case to be decided in two clauses which are at variance with each other.
