Renaissance man went out with his many glory. Perhaps he is adept in science, as well as in politics and economics, like Benjamin Franklin. Or perhaps an experienced businessman, translator and interpreter, among many other things. Such were the innumerable few faculties of Thomas More. Many of these skills allowed them to occupy positions of great importance, such as Lord Chancellor of England. Rather, it was the image of Renaissance society that Thomas More embodied. Prosperous citizens were citizens who signified humanism, individualism and secularism, not unlike in our country. the society of the famous (a.k.a. prosperous citizens) are those who represent appearance, wealth and status (all ideals of our age). These themes not only represented Thomas More, but he was also loved and admired by the public as a great friend and example of character. This fact shows the external effect on society, the cornerstone of humanity. Thomas More is the epitome of the Renaissance man from his life to his writings.
St. Thomas lived his life strictly in vanities, yet he was still very rich and frequently indulged in it . public affairs As little more than a merchant and peacemaker, he was appointed Sheriff of London in 1510, under King Henry VIII . This job was developed to advise the Mayor and two Sheriffs of the city, especially in legal matters, since Sheriffs usually do not have technical legal education. Thomas More was a lawyer, he studied at Lincoln’s Inn (one of the four legal societies that prepares its students for admission to the bar) and became a member of the bar in 1501. Thomas More held the office of “judge of the city, where he represented the sheriffs in court. But this position was not simply In the previous year, more serious negotiations were held between the Antwerp merchants and the London companies, and the disputes with the Antwerp merchants were even more serious 6. Having already become successful and popular, his celebrity rose even more readily at court.
The morals of public service certainly did not end there. In 1515, he was asked by several London merchants to be a delegate in the affairs of Anglo-Flandish merchants in Bruges and Antwerp. His genius was frequently called upon for innumerable public affairs, and moreover Thomas More was consistently successful. King Henry VIII was soon so impressed that in 1517 More was in charge of the king’s council. The following year, Magis resigned from his post as Sub-Sheriff, following a lawsuit with his label “General Patron of the Poor”, and became a Judge in the Court of Petitions. This court is basically designed for poor petitions. In 1521 More became knight and sub-treasurer, and in 1525 became chancellor of the Duchy of Lancastria. Finally, in 1529, the highest judicial officer in England was assigned to the Lord Chancellor.
The sheer amount of public service that Thomas More accomplished fits the definition of humanity very snugly, and in fact it almost feels more likely the other way around. That is, the greater model from which the characters of humanity are taken. For example: Civil humanism asserts that individual achievement and education can only be fully realized if those skills serve cities and help their citizens. Not only did he serve more nonstop in London, but he also helped the poor and was known as a friend. like the E.M.G. Routh writes, “He cared less for his wealth than most, but he valued them for two things: they afforded him opportunities to help his neighbors, and they enabled him to practice the hospitality in which he delighted.” In addition, there is the idea that the ideal Renaissance man is a universal man, or one with multiple abilities. In this he shows more of his political skills and talent as a translator, lawyer, writer, and historian. In the manner of humanity, he was learned in Greek and Latin, and read the Holy Scriptures, the Fathers of the Church, and liked all kinds of literature. He also studied the classics, and it is quite clear that he read Plato’s Republic, which probably inspired Utopia. so similar in spirit.
In Utopia, Magis insists on the idea that people can take care of themselves without a tyrannical government or a single religion. He writes about how stupid governments can otherwise prevent societies from running smoothly. but it fosters community and unity, and brings equality to all. With regard to religion, he writes that one of the most ancient laws is the tolerance of all religions, and that no one should be punished because of religion. Rather, he explains his belief that religion should not be mixed with political affairs, explaining how Utopia advises to avoid religious war, or corruption in any religious cause. Accepting all religions, accepting exile as punishment for discrimination, while Utopians forbid all religions. Moreover, Utopia detests war, since its “glory” is seen as a base thing on earth. The same rule also applies to princes, and since wars of religion are not a possibility, then religion itself is removed from duty. For example, if a Prince decided based on his religion, he contradicted the ancient laws. Dissolving such a rule would make citizens suspicious. They can therefore argue that the prince is trying to enslave them, and More reports, “The prince is for life, unless the suspicion is raised of some plan to enslave the people” (Magis book II Magistrates). A review of all these can lead to the conclusion that the morals of mixing the theory of religion and politics will always result in war. reaction This is a very secular thought, especially interesting if against More a serious religious subject. This only further illustrates Morales’ individualism.
Innumerable people tell of Magis how he was surprised by the signs of his immovable behavior. As has been said before, he was as fair in judgment as he was in a famous manner. But declarations such as that of Charles V, “I would rather have lost the best city in my dominion than such a counselor as More,” truly show love for More. Dean Celer even up to that point affirmed that Mores was “… a man of the greatest virtue this kingdom ever produced.” After this praise, it seems reasonable to say that such a virtue is a unique characteristic of More’s writer, showing his unique character. Even more, he cared for everyone and anyone around him, and he could even enjoy everyone’s company. Presently biting, to amuse follies, and to have many witty conversations with them.
Children are always highly encouraged to be honest and truthful. There are also common social norms of loyal friends of heroes. But what is the reason for all the honesty surrounding the hype? Thomas Morus is certainly a worthy example. Thomas Morus showed himself to be a distinguished humanist, as well as a secular thinker and a brave man. He is in all things a Renaissance man, but in all his perfect life his virtue seems to be his greatest good.
