Imagine a world where you can cure cancer by choosing to delete the genes in your children’s body, not having to worry about your child fighting a growing disease that ends his life even after all the fighting. Oh, this wonderful world, full of terror. Then to the news that you see where the scientist talks about a new race of people mixing with the old, to clean up the races of interest from all people. To make a special class.
A designer baby is a term used to describe a cloned embryo that has had its genes selected. Now one thing you can do with this is choose what eye color and what your baby will have or what gender it will be. In the future, scientists want to be able to pick and choose exactly which genes your child will have, meaning removing some and replacing them with genes engineered in the lab. All of this can be the difference between a child with a great personality and a child with a sad personality. Scientists are extremely excited about checking out the results of a new era in humanity, but do they think about the downsides? Why do they believe that these experiments will work well on humans, when the experiments on animals do not work at all? Doing things for and against white scientists have less good effects than bad effects. Is this an ethical improvement for the human race to improve?
Animal experiments have gone quite well in some of the most interesting things, but those are the only times you hear about the interesting ones. These scientists doing experiments don’t want to talk when something goes wrong. In most experiments both the cloned bay and its host mother dies, otherwise the baby is still born; We live in rarities. These rarities are those that are widely open in the world, and they show the test. In the face of these cases, the abortive child refused to be included. She is emotionally damaging, and quite possibly physically damaging to the mother.
When scholars are engaged in writing for a con list in the designer’s children, they can also admit that the effects of things that can happen are far greater than the good effects. The good results consist of preventing genetic diseases such as cancer, giving birth to parents parenting children preventing children from health problems in the future, and less stress for parents You want everything great for your child, but what if the chances of that happening are low? When the embryos are taken from the mother or host, the minimum is 4 taken, maybe 1 out of four will become a baby. The rest were thrown away. Genetic generation allows parents to choose exactly how their child will act and how they will look. Therefore, adding to this seems to deprive the offspring of unique qualities. Many are born as another blessed child.
Is this moral behavior? Do learned men think they are gods? A statement from the scientists states “even people who accept the growth of genetic knowledge, genetics, genetics, growth genetics and technology are concerned. engineers, and any government authority armed with genetic technology… “Dr. Leon Cass. The very scientists who work in this business know exactly what people are thinking, why don’t they extinguish our fears? Ethics is consistent with principles of right conduct. Are these experiments ethical when not everyone agrees?
When these babies grow up, and how they were conceived, like any other baby, what will they think? Do they believe they are abominations, built and tested on lab rats? Since experiments on animals fail, and these experiments are intended for humans, why should we conduct such experiments? Since scientists agree that there are still more serious effects than honest effects, why do we still tend to perform these experiments on humans? Why do we believe that we are ethically correct when not everyone agrees that this is ethical? Does your baby really think it’s the way to go?
Information found:
www.howard-winn.k12.ia.us/profects/ind_stdy06/ac/desbab/procon.html
www.ifgene.org/proscons.htm
www.scienceprogress.org
