This research examines how capitalist society created a system of oppression that fostered the growth of black communism. Second, this research aims to consider how communism affects certain issues, such as the “nationalization of culture” and the “black question” that are critical to understanding the oppressions that created the black system of Marxism.
Through a careful consideration of what scholars have noted about these two subjects, it will be possible to elucidate how black communism as a black political movement is realized. In addition, examining black Marxism as a political movement provides a more comprehensive understanding of the writings produced by political actors such as W.E.B. It will be possible for DuBois, Amiri Baraka and Marcus Garvey. Taken as a whole, black Marxism speaks volumes of the injustice and hypocrisy of the system created under the guise of democracy.
In order to begin this investigation, it is first useful to consider a general overview of black Marxism and how it has been conceptualized and defined by scholars. Researchers examining the broad context of political movements in the US have noted that the development of Marxism as a response to Leftist domination and oppression has long been a part of American political movements. According to one author, “In Western societies for the better part of the past two centuries, active and intellectual opposition to the left of class rule has been enlivened by a socialist vision: the order of human relations based on common responsibility and authority in the social media of production and reproduction” (Kelley and Robinson, 1 ).The author here argues that the socialist doctrine, which he saw as Leftist opposition, was followed by the dogma of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and V.I Lenin Although both Engels and Lenin supported a slightly different view of the socialist tradition, both based their works on the doctrines espoused by Karl Marx (1).
While Marxism has clearly been alive and well in the US for several decades, scholars examining the development of black Marxism have noted that this political and social system evolved because of the difficulties that resulted from the establishment and subsequent abolition of slavery (Dawson, 173). Dawson specifically states: “Black Marxism has its roots in history and culture, which evolved from African American resistance first to slavery, then to the decades of economic, political and social subordination that followed the defeat of what DuBois called Black Reconstruction.” (173). Dawson goes on to note that the context of black Marxism—in direct response to the social, political, and economic conditions existing at a particular time—seems to be the same driving force behind black Marxism. According to Dawson, “…Marxism seemed to provide a vehicle for capturing the apparent inability of capitalism to economically incorporate the wealthiest sectors of the black community […] In this perspective, both democracy and economic promotion of the working-class white middle-class in black exclusion and economic superexploitation they are placed” (174).
When the specific context of the development of black Marxism is examined in this perspective, it appears that Marxism is the framework of politics and black Social actors to understand why the system of capitalism could not provide for all societies and classes in society. However, as Dawson notes, some historians have argued that Black Marxism was initiated by whites and had no apparent indigenous roots in the black community (175). This is clearly not the case. Dawson contends that, with the development of black Marxism as a leading political movement in the US, it becomes clear the issues of race and oppression inherent in the social, political and Americans in the United States of America clearly had an impact on the development of this political movement. In this context it can now be considered in a certain context how capitalist society created a system of oppression that fostered the growth of black communism. By looking at the specific underlying issues that promulgated the black community to adopt Marxian doctrines, it will be possible to gain a fuller understanding of how black politics was confused with the communist doctrines of white European scholars. This intelligent process is the key to understanding the major problems that exist in African-american-hair”>African in today’s society
Critically reviewing what has been written about the development of black Marxism in the US, it becomes quite clear African Americans an extensive history of being constantly subjected to oppression which subsequently encouraged gross social, political and economic inequities for this people. In an effort to systematically review this history and to understand the application of Marxian doctrine, one author makes the following observations:
In the 1800s, that analysis indicated that wage labor could not be free unless slave labor was destroyed. In the 1930s that analysis meant that labor, black and white, should be organized as one in industrial unions, even though segregation was the law of the land. In the 1950s it signified Black-white unity in the fight against segregation and the denial of civil rights, civil rights, of the African-American people (Myles, “Black history…”.
This author argues, “Class consciousness, but more so socialist consciousness, indicates that any part of labor can be reduced to the misery and poverty that black and brown labor has become accustomed to” (Myles, “Black History…”).
With this in context, it seems reasonable to argue that the black Marxist movement made it possible to recognize the fundamental position of African Americans in society after a time Servitudes have not been changed. Although the application of the social, political and economic system has been advanced for the prosperity of all citizens, African Americans have been significantly pushed back in this they remain in the system. Marxism clearly provides a basis for understanding why this oppression continues, even when changes are made to improve the status quo. For African Americans, the social and economic inequalities they face are a fundamental part of the larger system of capitalism. As such, these inequalities are difficult if not impossible for African Americans to overcome. It remains part of the social discourse and the main reason for society’s failure to effectively improve the social and economic status of the entire African American community.
Although the development of black Marxism can be traced back to the historical oppression of race that has existed in the US since the time of slavery, it is clear that the formal social institutionalization of black Marxism did not take shape until the twenty-first century. As noted by one author, the oppression of African Americans in the US in the early 1920s culminated in a movement toward radicalism. Many scholars have viewed this emigration as “… the only way to black liberation in a country where blacks were brutally oppressed, where the provisions of the liberal constitution were almost empty and where blacks were poorly counted, thus rendering any nationalist political solution problematic.” (Dawson, 177).This effectively suggests that the African American desire for social, political, and economic improvement did not simply stem from the educational progress of Marxism. Rather, radical ideologies such as Marxism were embraced as a direct result of the African American struggle to gain basic freedoms. they were granted to their man.
In addition to illustrating why radical political ideologies were embraced by the black community, Dawson also illustrates why a nationalist movement failed to materialize at this time. Although most blacks shared a commonhistory of development in the United States of America, as a group many scholars felt that if African Americans the sheer size and they lacked the courage to create a solid national movement that could effectively improve the black condition overall. Thus, radicalism—especially in the form of socialism—became a central vehicle in the early development of black Americans. of the twentieth century
Arguably, examining this point reveals the application of Marxism to the larger problems faced by African Americans in United States. Rather, the application of Marxism was initiated to advance the political rights of the black community. At the beginning of the twentieth century, this movement coalesced into a loosely-coherent group of radical organizations that combined black Marxism and black nationalism (Dawson, 181). Black Marxist ideologies , which flourished in the early 20th century, expanded in the 1960s and 70s as African Americans took active roles in the Civil Rights movement (181). Dawson argues that in the early 1920s, the focus of political movements in the black community was on integrating white and black labor (184). refers to the black community.
Communist position on issues such as “Nationalization of Culture”
With the rudimentary development of the black Marxist movement highlighted, it is now possible to consider how communism attempted to address key issues. the black community. In particular, the issues are called the “Negro National Question” and the “nationalization of culture.” By examining how the Communist position addresses these issues, it will be possible to further understand the development of literature and discourse as it relates to the development and progress of the Marxist black movement in United States.
Looking first at the issue of the Negro National Question, Dawson considers how the Communist International-Communist constitution viewed this question. Specifically, Dawson notes that COMINTER issued a resolution in 1928 that advocated self-determination for African Americans (184). However, as Dawson notes, “Africa is nowhere … typical of an oppressed nation” (184). This arrangement was like an attack to implement the policy of “autonomous government” in the South and “equal rights” in the North. As such, in the early years of the 20th century, the Communist Party did not recognize the need for greater autonomy for African Americans. The purpose of the Marxist movement was to advance the greater good of blacks as workers to unite the greater good so that all workers would advance as well as whites (184).
Although the COMINTERN provided a clear line for the black community to follow when it came to social and economic development, many scholars rejected the Communist Party’s message, contending that the definition provided by the COMINTERN served as the foundation of the African American tradition. as it is markedly different from what is per album. “African Americans have their own identifiable, autonomous traditions of radicalism” (185). This is in the context of practice for those who support this ideology. Dawson goes on to note that this paradigm “… provided the ideological space for communists to seek black liberation with their allies, providing a platform to fight reformist elements in the black community” (186). Thus, when responding to the Negro Nationalism, the Communist Party made a clear line of demarcation for the development of black Marxism.
Discussing the development of black Marxism in relation to the Negro National Question, Dawson goes on to note that the struggle for equality developed in both the North and the South, the oppression of the upper class. class was more clear. When the face of black Marxism began to develop under the framework established by the Congress in the Negro National Question, the movement for equality became a “class struggle as opposed to black liberation” (191). For this reason, the specific context of the Negro Nation-Question highlights a movement that reflected both class struggles and black community struggles.
Dawahare in examining the Negro question examined by the Communist Party makes the observation that the specific response given to the Negro in the 1920s had an impact on the development of black national identity until the 1960s (Dawahare, 20). As this author noted, “However, the emergence of black Socialists in the early 1920s” with the question of the “Nego question” as a question about race protected them from the oppression of the camps as a radical or national question, here a theoretical error. which fueled a host of nationalist myths about black identity and liberation that dominated leftist thought until the 1960s” (20). What this shows is that the specific context in which communism answered the “Black question” clearly had an impact on the development of black identity and on political activism until the Civil Rights Movement.
In addition to examining communist ideology on the Negro National Question, it also looks at the communist position on the nationalization of culture. In examining writings by black scholars in the twenty-first century, Dawahare notes that the communist concept of cultural nationalization could be seen in the writings of black scholars in the twenty-first century. In particular, this author observes a consideration of the Communist Party’s concept of nationalism as reflected in Wright’s writings. In particular, “…a common black national culture originated in a feudal plantation economy” and subsisted in the Jim Crow political system in the South ( 113). The author here argues that, like the Communist Party, he has not claimed the blackness of his nation’s culture; the nation’s rather cultural effort on African Americans was a direct result of social, political, and economic oppression (113). Thus, for the African American, the challenge has become to overcome the constraints of black nationalism that restrict the African American’s ability to gain social gains (114).
Scholastic Works in the Era of Black Marxism
With this framework in mind, it is now possible to consider a clearer picture of leftist politics illustrated by prominent black scholars. He looks back at the first work by W.E.B. One DuBois scholar notes that Dubois’ work was marked by a clear belief in criticizing African Americans for their social, economic, and political status (McCartney, 69). According to McCartney, DuBois “blamed Negroes largely for their condition,” placing an emphasis on “help and duties rather than rights” (69-70). Because DuBois so firmly believed in the importance of self-reliance as a means of promoting African American movements, it is not surprising that DuBois favored Socialist ideologies from the early 1900s;
… By 1914 he believed that the economic crisis was in large part the cause of the national problem and sympathized with the Socialist Movement. Later, Du Bois looked at both African-American and African-American capital affairs, “and predicted that the affairs of all races would unite and overthrow the common oppressor capital” (72).
Other authors examine the contributions that DuBois made to the black Marxist movement, noting that DuBois began to oppose DuBois in the 1950s against the anti-communist policies that were being undertaken by the US (Bush, 46). DuBois thought that the “a href=”https://e-info.vn/tag/foreign-policy”>foreign policy being pursued in the US was indicative of a larger movement towards the oppression of other nations that had developed well in relation to the African American community .DuBois, as noted by Bush, “obtained the indivisibility of the anti-colonial struggles in the Third World and the Black struggle for freedom, justice and equality” (46).
DuBois was not the only scholar to see the foreign policy of the United States as directly linked to the oppression of developing nations. Considering the work of Leroy Jones, later known as Amiri Baraka, one author notes that the works produced by this scholar brought to light the world’s problems with American imperialism and classicism, which shaped the results of American foreign policy (Peniel, 4). In particular, Baraka could usefully ignite the minds of apolitical black bohemians to understand how the larger context of capitalism in the US is impacting individuals from foreign countries (4). Through this scholarly work, the true nature of American oppression, the sham of both capitalism and democracy, has been revealed. Interestingly, however, until the Civil Rights Movement, black Marxism came more into the development of autonomy in the African American community than an attempt at cohesion among all working class citizens.
Finally, when looking at the work of Mark Garvey, it can also be seen the obvious way he believed in the black community. As noted by one scholar, “Garvey argues that black people are responsible for their own destinies in the natural world and to ‘avoid the white man because of the physical conditions for which we are responsible'” (McCartney, 81). While Garvey strongly believed in the need for self-reliance in the black community, he also He argued that many of the institutions that were trying to improve the were not working towards this end. “The difference between the UNIA and the movements of this country, and probably the world, is that the UNIA seeks freedom of government, while other organizations seek to make the Negro a secondary part of existing governments” (82). Thus, the importance of creating autonomy in the larger context of the black community can be seen in these teachings. Black Marxism therefore had to shift its focus in the 1960s and 70s to a means for African Americans to support their cause without the process of white/black cohesion.
Discussion
When you look at the entire black Marxist revolution, it becomes clear that there are a multitude of challenges facing blacks in experiencing social freedom and being able to achieve some level of social integration. As noted by one author, “Workers and Intellectuals have different life experiences that lead them to view the world differently, since all Black people share racial and class oppression on a double level. So Black workers and Black prisoners are more than likely to have different conceptual and speculative reasons (Ahmad, “League …”) This suggests that the development of black Marxism was not only shaped by the larger context of the black experience in poverty residents, the works produced by black scholars—i.e., Dubois, for example—were more reflective of the upper class.
Arguably, when examined at this point, it becomes clear that there were countless issues that exerted an influence on the development of black Marxism in the early and mid-twentieth century. The system of capitalism, which existed in the United States, and continues to achieve phyletic expansion. As noted by one author, “racism” developed and persisted in some or all segments of white labor, because labor, as in modern times, has failed to create an alternative to the economic system and must, as a better one, still have to realize its own. policies within the framework of capitalism” (Williams, 104). While this indeed represents a real reality for both whites and blacks, the development of black Marxism was led by scholars examining the overall system of race and gender associations that surrounded the entire African existence in the United States of America. as such, the conception of capitalism as a definitive position for racism and racial inequality is not easily delineated.
The ultimate goal of the black community is to achieve some degree of social cohesion and political and economic stability. However, as Cornell West has shown in his work, the advancement of African American intellectuals—with theoretically the same rights and privileges as white intellectuals—is a problem that remains problematic for the entire black community. As was said by this author;
In addition to the general anti-intellectual trend of American society, there is a great distrust and suspicion of black intellectuals in the black community. This distrust and suspicion arises not only from the usual arrogance and haughty disposition of intellectuals towards the common people, but rather from the refusal of many black intellectuals to remain, in any visible way, organically connected with African cultural life (West; 60-1).
Therefore, while it is black students who provide the rhetorical basis for the development of ideological and political movements, often the experiences and expressions of these people are not taken to clearly indicate what the social discourse is about the life of African American citizens. When this is put into context, it is easy to understand why black Marxism did not develop as an independent movement in the development of the black community until the Civil Rights Movement.
.
conclusion
When the development of black Marxism is reviewed as a whole, it is clear that this process was one that developed a multitude of internal and external issues in the black community. While African Americans clearly understood the problems of racial oppression that they worshiped as an attack on social-inequality, supported by ideology The Communist Party, coupled with black scholars, marked the development of black identity, and the growth of black Marxism in the early 20th century.When it first began, the black Marxism movement was largely conceived as a movement for the integration of black and white labor in an effort to improve social and economic conditions for all workers.
Unfortunately it was not until the Civil Rights Movement in the United in the United only in infancy and black organizations began to conceptualize the African American experience as separate from the experience of the white working class. This realization seems to have led to the movement for independent living and the independent living movement to improve the lives part of African America. In this context, the system of racial oppression that was established by the indoctrination of capitalism actually served as the basis for the long-term oppression of the African American community.
Bibliography
Ahmad, Muhammad. “Union of Revolutionary Black Workers.” 17 March 2006
http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/rbwstudy.html.
Bush, Rod “The Civil Rights Movement and the Continuing Fight for America’s Redemption.” Social Justice, 30,1 (2003): 42-61.
Dawahare, Anthony. Nationalism, Marxism, and Africa between wars between wars: The New Pandora’s Box. University Press of Mississippi, 2002, p.
Dawson, Michael. Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African-American Political Ideology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2001.
Kelley, Robin and Robinson, Cedric. Black Marxism: The Black Radical Party Tradition. University of North Carolina Press, 2000.
Myles, Goddess. “Black History and Marxist Education.” Feb 23, 2002 People’s Weekly World. 17 March 2006
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/596.html.
McCartney, John T. Black Power Ideology: An Essay in African-American Political Thought. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992.
Peniel, Joseph E. Dashikis and Democracy: Black Studies, Student Activism, and the Black Power Movement. American History.
West, Col. “The Dilemma of the Black Intellectual.” Cultural Criticism. 1 (1985, Aug.): 109-124.
William, Sidney. “Can Marxism Explain America’s Racism?” Social Problems. 28.2 (1980, December): 98-112.
