Circumcised vs. Uncircumcised

Much has been debated throughout the last century, and perhaps even longer, about whether circumcision is the best, and more importantly, the healthiest decision to make as a male child for your child. Christians, I believe, I will tell you that in Genesis 17:11 God said to Abraham: You are going to undergo circumcision, and it will be a sign of the covenant between me and you. Genesis 17:12 adds saying: “For the future generation, I have circumcised for you every male who is eight days old, and who are born in your house … the opinions of any religion, but only the pros and cons of circumcision, and that the judgment is best for young children born

Let us first begin with the definition of circumcision. According to WebMD, “circumcision is elective surgery to remove the foreskin, the fold of skin that covers and protects the round tip of the penis. � Is this surgery necessary to live a normal life as a male? Indeed, according to the University of Michigan Health System, only 60% of American men are circumcised now compared to 90% in 1979.� Pros and cons of being circumcised or circumcised. uncircumcised men do one course of action over another.

One of the first reasons why circumcisions were done was because of religion. After this, he first believed that circumcision would help prevent diseases sexually. This opinion was especially popular among the English people. Disproved, of course, and research shows that there is no difference between circumcision and circumcision when it comes to sexually transmitted diseases.

Again, the University of Michigan Health System teaches that there are at least three purposes for the foreskin.

One of these is that the head of the penis is protected from urine, feces, and other irritants. Dilute the irritation with soap and water after cutting. But uncircumcised males are still required to maintain health. When you consider circumcision for this reason, ask yourself, “Whether it is easier to retract the foreskin and wash it, or to wash it as it is there, without having the foreskin there?”

Next, it protects the urethra against infection or scarring. While this may sound like just a reason to keep your child’s foreskin on the surface, it is extremely unlikely that both will happen to your child. Infection or scarring of the urinary opening is extremely rare and is hardly heard of in the medical community.

Thirdly, the foreskin is to protect the top of the penis. Most men know that the tip of the penis is the most sensitive, and the foreskin is there to protect that sensitivity. I can find no disadvantage in that the sense may be defended, yet, as circumcised men know, this is not at all necessary, if the general precautions are followed.

The only thing that the University of Michigan’s Health System (UMHS) is reducing is not as rare as the rare effect of uncircumcised mares being harassed by circumcised couples when they are in the shower or in their rooms. Most children and adolescents do not like to play games, which can sometimes cause extreme emotional distress in young children who are taking their first steps into adulthood.

The UMHS also states that circumcision is performed even in the first year of life in males, to prevent treatment conditions. Next, UMHS lists the pain that the surgical procedure causes the child. I agree with anesthetic to relieve pain, although most doctors use anesthetic. I also believe that this pain causes less pain to the baby than the pain from Urinary Tract Infection. would be

The third issue is the cost of the exit and who the price is. UMHS advises that many insurances do not pay for circumcision. This is and is not true. If your child’s doctor thinks circumcision medically necessary (as in some cases) more than likely; Your insurance carrier will pay for the surgery. Also, TriCare and Public Insurance Association (PEIA) and many other companies still pay for surgery, even if it is not medically necessary. If you find that the company is not for you, talk to your doctor and see if he can explain insurance company about the benefits of preventive circumcision< /a>. More than likely, your insurance company will see that this simple process can save money down the road if what problems will happen if the child is left uncircumcised.

Finally, the UMHS states that circumcision should be decided quickly. They conclude that if you leave your child uncircumcised, and later wish to have it done, general anesthesia must be used if the child is two months older. However, parents have at least nine months to make a decision and, if the conception is planned, they have even longer. I know parents don’t find out whether it’s a boy or a girl until the ultrasound, or they choose not to find out until the birth. However, deciding whether or not your baby should be circumcised should start as soon as you conceive, during pregnancy, and this will save the energy of a last-minute decision. If you happen to have a virgin, of course you don’t need to worry about circumcision. At least you were prepared if it was a child.

Finally, it seems to me that circumcision is best, because I believe that the pros outweigh the cons. But this is not my decision to make for someone else. Sit down by yourself, with your significant other or any family members involved, talk about the issue, and decide for yourself. No article, university scholar, or anyone associated with the medical community can make that decision for you. Mind the pros and cons, do some research yourself, and make an informed decision about your child.

Report:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *