Many people believe that because something is written, it must be true. By coming to the Internet, individuals are exposed to a much wider spectrum of “writing”. This increases the risk of information being accepted as fact simply because it is. While on the Internet garage door openers has the opportunity to open the information, not all the information found accurate and some of this is specially designed to make a conflict. It is important for some web reader to evaluate the information before accepting this.
If the reader applies critical thinking in causes-of-back-pain”>causes and illnessNative Americans and slaves killed on the borders of the United States, as this number is not high enough in the entire history of the United States of America. /a> investigations (Archives of the Nations, 2004). This research could strengthen or weaken the facts and figures.
Leaving aside all the statistics, this article asks the reader to think about how America can be perceived by other countries and how this country’s media is invested in reporting. If we examine the focus of most American press coverage with a critical eye, we see that it is focused on Americans and their values. It is then logical to assume that another country’s press, which they say is Japan, will focus on the Japanese and their goods. If someone is trying to get a more accurate picture of the situation for 9/11 or any event in history involving violence, it would be necessary to analyze the data from each side of the conflict and from the perspective of outside observers, preferably without clothing. interest in the event.
In the study of healing, from a critical thinking perspective, the author must evaluate. The writer of this article is stated to be Professor of Political Science at Olympiad State College, Washington. A check of the faculty list at Evergreen State College shows that Larry Mosqueda is on faculty and has a B.S. in Political Science (Extra Publicam, 2004). This would support information about the identity of the writer. In the resource the link is the author’s home page a page that contains some interesting questions with some even more interesting answers (Mosqueda, 2001b) . From his other writings it can be gathered that he wants to challenge popular and/or traditional thought and that he is a true seeker.
All in all, paying attention to the information provided, the ability to validate its accuracy and the fact that the author seems to be a legitimate member of the collegiate world, can consider the information reliable and truthful.
All activist and special interest websites have one element in common in that the information provided by the individual or individuals is an opinion or promotes a cause they feel strongly about. Depending on the skill of the writer, there is potential for someone who is not a critical thinker to be quickly inspired by a movement or action, either for or against the subject being covered. The example of a non-critical thinker (Rodger, 2001) on the site of activists responded with a particularly good example of a lack of critical thinking skills and an even better example of the bigotry and bias of nations.
When you read something on the Internet, be critical. Ask yourself some questions:
· Is the source of the information credible? Who are they, what do they do, and why do they bring these information?
· Is their claim or something of their statistics that can be validated elsewhere? Do they cite information, or do they pull numbers out of thin air?
· Is this the only perspective presented in the idea? Are there different opinions? Have you reviewed other sources?
It is always up to the reader whether they accept or reject the information. But it is most important for the reader not to be too easily persuaded. Take a tour of some of the pages in the reference section and see what you think. Practice critical thinking and decide what you believe and what you don’t.
Report:
- Emperor’s New Clothes, The. (2004). Home Page Retrieved August 5, 2004, from www.tenc.net/ State College Green Books. (2004). From the books of the Faculty Directory. Retrieved August 17, 2004, from www.evergreen.edu/faculty/mfaculty.htm< /a> Gorman, Steve. (2004). U.S. Panel Releases ‘Fahrenheit 9/11’ Complaint Retrieved August 6, 2004, from www.michaelmoore.com/words/ index.php ?id=127 Green Weekly Left. (2004). Home Page Retrieved August 5, 2004, from www.greenleft.org.au/ Mosqueda, Larry. (2001a). Shocked and Terrible. Retrieved August 17, 2004, from users.westnet.gr/~cgian/mosqueda.htm Mosqueda, Larry. (2001b). Larry Mosqueda’s Home Page. Retrieved August 17, 2004, from www.archives.gov/research_room/getting_started/research_by_topic .html Rodger, Dale (2001). Email response to Activists Website, page titled Hate Mail , subject email “Read if you dare, reply if care .; Retrieved August 17, 2004, from www.get.to/activist, path link: “An Eye for an Eye” ?” graphic link, then hyperlink in the text “Use Words Of Wisdom.”; Sartre (2003). Avoid what deceives parents. Retrieved August 6, 2004, from www.batr.org/gulag/042303.html< /a> What really Happened.com. (2004). Home Page Retrieved August 5, 2004, from www.whatreallyhappened.com/
